![]() I stand in solidarity with all of the people that the B.P.O.E. I am no longer a member or a supporter of the Elks. I can only assume they won’t accept full equality until it is forced upon them, and they’ll resist it even then. They clearly interpret “thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” to mean “if we can prevent LGBTQ people from renting homes, getting jobs, or buying property here, they won’t be our neighbors and we won’t have to love them.”Īs an organization that officially banned Black people until 1973 and officially banned women until 1993, change comes slowly to the Elks. At that moment, the Elks crossed the line from practicing discrimination and bigotry within their own organization to publicly lobbying against equality and human rights. Along with our police chief at the time, they didn’t want atheists, Muslims, gays, or transgender people to live here. Our local Elks lodge - which I had proudly led just a few years earlier - joined a local church in vehemently opposing the NDR. In a nutshell, it stated that the city should welcome everybody equally and that everyone should have the same access to housing, jobs, and other basic human rights. Then, in 2017, a non-discrimination resolution (NDR) was proposed in our town. My suggestion was not met with enthusiasm, either in our local lodge nor the Grand Lodge. I told him that I felt strongly that we should drop that membership requirement. In 2015, I had an opportunity to meet the GER (Grand Exalted Ruler – the top official in the whole organization), Ronald Hicks, and I told him that discriminating against atheists was preventing some active, caring people from becoming members of the organization. Their discrimination against non-Christians bothered me, but within our Lodge I knew that a belief in God could be stretched to apply to many non-Christian religions, so I kept my membership. I later became chair of their Board of Trustees. I “sat the chairs,” holding almost every officer position up to and including “Exalted Ruler” of Beartooth Lodge #534 - an office I held for three terms. My father was an Elk, and I became a member in 2002. To this day, the Elks have an official requirement that members must “believe in God,” which was the subject of my previous Elks blog post. A ban on members of the communist party came and went.īut some discrimination remained, encoded into the very DNA of the Elks. In 1993, they began accepting women as members. In the early 70s, the Elks dropped their ban on non-white members. ![]() Over time, the discriminatory membership requirements were loosened, mostly through outside pressure and lawsuits. ![]() Article VII, § 4 of the Constitution of the B.P.O.E. No person shall be accepted as a member of this Order unless he be a white male citizen of the United States of America, of sound mind and body, of good character, not under the age of Twenty-one years, and a believer in God. ![]() Benevolent Protective Order of Elks, 1974) included this in the notes: One lawsuit against the Elks ( Cornelius v. Although they jealously guard official documents and rituals, details came out. It was a social club exclusively for American white men. When it was formed in 1868, the Elks was definitely a product of its time. I never thought that ten years later, it would still be one of the most-read posts on my blog! Quite a bit has changed since then, so it’s time for an update. This is a follow-up to The Benevolent and Protective Order of (non-atheist) Elks, which I wrote in 2011. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |